![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
- Thu, 17:22: I'm at Marshall Pickens Psychiatric Hospital (701 Grove Road, Greenville) http://4sq.com/fZ3tLS
- Thu, 17:41: RT @robpegoraro: Slight Minion malfunction in the press room (poor guy faceplanted). http://twitpic.com/3nmhxm #ces
- Thu, 17:42: RT @HeidiAmes: The barest pink on the mountaintop. At last light today. #vt #vermont http://yfrog.com/h3mjgjbj
- Thu, 17:57: Nutriment! http://twitpic.com/3nmnua
- Thu, 19:47: is inexplicably in a mood to houseclean and take junk to the dump. Pity that he won't be home for a week.
- Thu, 20:45: RT @kscincotta: @jayfurr -- I always choose my mental health facilities based on their pool toys.
- Fri, 09:20: Tomorrow's forecast for Atlanta: sunny, high of 42. Pondering shorts and T-shirt for #the3day training walk.
- Fri, 11:20: Welcome to Team Twitter ATL, @krazykate30 #the3day
- Fri, 11:22: We have 19 members of Team Twitter ATL, 17 of whom are here: http://bit.ly/ttatl-list #the3day
- Fri, 11:38: @krazykate30 @knittingbagel @kscincotta Did you hear about the planned Atlanta training walk for tomorrow? Can you come?
Jan. 7th, 2011
Defending "For The Cure"
Jan. 7th, 2011 03:26 pmMany people have heard recently, via a Huffington Post article or via a story that aired on the Colbert Report, that the Susan G. Komen organization is allegedly spending millions of donor dollars suing organizations that attempt to use the phrase "For The Cure" in their own fundraising activities.
I've been very bothered by these stories. Yes, they have a grain of truth to them. There have been legal efforts brought by Susan G. Komen For The Cure.
However, the truth is more nuanced than one might, at first blush, think. Here's my take on things:
First: I do not work for Susan G. Komen For The Cure or any of its affiliates. Nor am I an attorney.
That being said, it is an unfortunate fact of American trademark law that if you do not 'defend' your trademark, you lose it.
Susan G. Komen has invested a great deal of time and effort in guaranteeing that when someone donates to an organization or cause with "For The Cure" in its name, they are donating to an organization that they can trust and that will use the funds in a good way.
If they literally let anyone with good intentions use "For The Cure", they are extending their reputation into areas they cannot control and potentially risking everything they've built. I've gotten plenty of fundraising calls from fly-by-night organizations that turn over a tiny, tiny percentage of the funds they raise to the actual cause they claim to support. If Komen did not take action to protect their trademark, people might well donate to, oh, "Hikers For The Cure" only to find out later than everything donated went to line the organizers' pockets. This happens a LOT more often than you might think.
When an organization chooses to represent itself as "_____ For The Cure", rather than coming up with their own name, they're doing it precisely BECAUSE of the good will the Komen organization has built up and the trust the American people have in that phrase. Komen has a responsibility to see to it that the name continues to only be used by organizations that are trusted and responsible, and who will see to it that the donated money goes where the donors THINK it's going: to the fight against breast cancer.
Unfortunately, some of the organizations who chose to 'borrow' For The Cure chose to fight rather than cooperate ... and that's too bad, because the Komen organization has been more than willing to work out compromises that would permit use of the name, with a qualifier, such as when Kites For The Cure was allowed to use the term provided it was used in connection with the words "Uniting Against Lung Cancer" to make clear that it was not Komen-affiliated and that the money raised would NOT be going toward breast cancer.
That's the actual truth of this story -- and that's why, in the end, I am more than happy to continue volunteering and walking on behalf of Susan G. Komen For The Cure. Despite the bad press, no other organization comes close to the track record that the Komen organization possesses in the fight against breast cancer.
I've been very bothered by these stories. Yes, they have a grain of truth to them. There have been legal efforts brought by Susan G. Komen For The Cure.
However, the truth is more nuanced than one might, at first blush, think. Here's my take on things:
First: I do not work for Susan G. Komen For The Cure or any of its affiliates. Nor am I an attorney.
That being said, it is an unfortunate fact of American trademark law that if you do not 'defend' your trademark, you lose it.
Susan G. Komen has invested a great deal of time and effort in guaranteeing that when someone donates to an organization or cause with "For The Cure" in its name, they are donating to an organization that they can trust and that will use the funds in a good way.
If they literally let anyone with good intentions use "For The Cure", they are extending their reputation into areas they cannot control and potentially risking everything they've built. I've gotten plenty of fundraising calls from fly-by-night organizations that turn over a tiny, tiny percentage of the funds they raise to the actual cause they claim to support. If Komen did not take action to protect their trademark, people might well donate to, oh, "Hikers For The Cure" only to find out later than everything donated went to line the organizers' pockets. This happens a LOT more often than you might think.
When an organization chooses to represent itself as "_____ For The Cure", rather than coming up with their own name, they're doing it precisely BECAUSE of the good will the Komen organization has built up and the trust the American people have in that phrase. Komen has a responsibility to see to it that the name continues to only be used by organizations that are trusted and responsible, and who will see to it that the donated money goes where the donors THINK it's going: to the fight against breast cancer.
Unfortunately, some of the organizations who chose to 'borrow' For The Cure chose to fight rather than cooperate ... and that's too bad, because the Komen organization has been more than willing to work out compromises that would permit use of the name, with a qualifier, such as when Kites For The Cure was allowed to use the term provided it was used in connection with the words "Uniting Against Lung Cancer" to make clear that it was not Komen-affiliated and that the money raised would NOT be going toward breast cancer.
That's the actual truth of this story -- and that's why, in the end, I am more than happy to continue volunteering and walking on behalf of Susan G. Komen For The Cure. Despite the bad press, no other organization comes close to the track record that the Komen organization possesses in the fight against breast cancer.
Defending "For The Cure"
Jan. 7th, 2011 03:34 pmMany people have heard recently, via a Huffington Post article or via a story that aired on the Colbert Report, that the Susan G. Komen organization is allegedly spending millions of donor dollars suing organizations that attempt to use the phrase "For The Cure" in their own fundraising activities.
I've been very bothered by these stories. Yes, they have a grain of truth to them. There have been legal efforts brought by Susan G. Komen For The Cure.
However, the truth is more nuanced than one might, at first blush, think. Here's my take on things:
First: I do not work for Susan G. Komen For The Cure or any of its affiliates. Nor am I an attorney.
That being said, it is an unfortunate fact of American trademark law that if you do not 'defend' your trademark, you lose it.
Susan G. Komen has invested a great deal of time and effort in guaranteeing that when someone donates to an organization or cause with "For The Cure" in its name, they are donating to an organization that they can trust and that will use the funds in a good way.
If they literally let anyone with good intentions use "For The Cure", they are extending their reputation into areas they cannot control and potentially risking everything they've built. I've gotten plenty of fundraising calls from fly-by-night organizations that turn over a tiny, tiny percentage of the funds they raise to the actual cause they claim to support. If Komen did not take action to protect their trademark, people might well donate to, oh, "Hikers For The Cure" only to find out later than everything donated went to line the organizers' pockets. This happens a LOT more often than you might think.
When an organization chooses to represent itself as "_____ For The Cure", rather than coming up with their own name, they're doing it precisely BECAUSE of the good will the Komen organization has built up and the trust the American people have in that phrase. Komen has a responsibility to see to it that the name continues to only be used by organizations that are trusted and responsible, and who will see to it that the donated money goes where the donors THINK it's going: to the fight against breast cancer.
Unfortunately, some of the organizations who chose to 'borrow' For The Cure chose to fight rather than cooperate ... and that's too bad, because the Komen organization has been more than willing to work out compromises that would permit use of the name, with a qualifier, such as when Kites For The Cure was allowed to use the term provided it was used in connection with the words "Uniting Against Lung Cancer" to make clear that it was not Komen-affiliated and that the money raised would NOT be going toward breast cancer.
That's the actual truth of this story -- and that's why, in the end, I am more than happy to continue volunteering and walking on behalf of Susan G. Komen For The Cure. Despite the bad press, no other organization comes close to the track record that the Komen organization possesses in the fight against breast cancer.
I've been very bothered by these stories. Yes, they have a grain of truth to them. There have been legal efforts brought by Susan G. Komen For The Cure.
However, the truth is more nuanced than one might, at first blush, think. Here's my take on things:
First: I do not work for Susan G. Komen For The Cure or any of its affiliates. Nor am I an attorney.
That being said, it is an unfortunate fact of American trademark law that if you do not 'defend' your trademark, you lose it.
Susan G. Komen has invested a great deal of time and effort in guaranteeing that when someone donates to an organization or cause with "For The Cure" in its name, they are donating to an organization that they can trust and that will use the funds in a good way.
If they literally let anyone with good intentions use "For The Cure", they are extending their reputation into areas they cannot control and potentially risking everything they've built. I've gotten plenty of fundraising calls from fly-by-night organizations that turn over a tiny, tiny percentage of the funds they raise to the actual cause they claim to support. If Komen did not take action to protect their trademark, people might well donate to, oh, "Hikers For The Cure" only to find out later than everything donated went to line the organizers' pockets. This happens a LOT more often than you might think.
When an organization chooses to represent itself as "_____ For The Cure", rather than coming up with their own name, they're doing it precisely BECAUSE of the good will the Komen organization has built up and the trust the American people have in that phrase. Komen has a responsibility to see to it that the name continues to only be used by organizations that are trusted and responsible, and who will see to it that the donated money goes where the donors THINK it's going: to the fight against breast cancer.
Unfortunately, some of the organizations who chose to 'borrow' For The Cure chose to fight rather than cooperate ... and that's too bad, because the Komen organization has been more than willing to work out compromises that would permit use of the name, with a qualifier, such as when Kites For The Cure was allowed to use the term provided it was used in connection with the words "Uniting Against Lung Cancer" to make clear that it was not Komen-affiliated and that the money raised would NOT be going toward breast cancer.
That's the actual truth of this story -- and that's why, in the end, I am more than happy to continue volunteering and walking on behalf of Susan G. Komen For The Cure. Despite the bad press, no other organization comes close to the track record that the Komen organization possesses in the fight against breast cancer.